![]() ![]() Their voices have been joined by First Nations chiefs and organizations across the country, including the Assembly of First Nations.Ĭhiefs have expressed concerns about the province of Ontario and the MNO recognizing six historic Métis communities based on research presented in 2017. So these agreements, and the modern self-government treaties that will come, do not deal with land or land-related issues,” said Froh.īut it is land and resources that have Ontario First Nations concerned and rallying this past Monday on Parliament Hill. There would have to be a determination of whether or not there was interest and, if there was, then the duty to consult would apply. “But, in the event that those types of things happen, then clearly…when we're talking about lands, in particular, there would have to be some conversation. The legislation does contemplate supplemental self-government agreements to be negotiated in the future and that could include land and resources. She expects those negotiations to be completed within the next two years, although she notes it took seven years to get to this point.įroh says the treaty will focus on citizenship, electing leaders, other core governance areas and “how we take care of our children.” The terms of the modern self-government treaties have yet to be negotiated, she says. Like the updated self-government recognition and implementation agreements that Canada signed with the MNO, Métis Nation of Alberta and Métis Nation-Saskatchewan in February, the legislation “is about governing ourselves and those areas of jurisdiction that are relevant to that,” said Froh. 35 “of certain Métis collectives and the recognition of the authority of Métis governments to act on behalf of those collectives.” The legislation advances the recognition of the right to self-determination, including the inherent right to self-government recognized and affirmed by Sect. This self-government implementation legislation performs “a function of giving Canada the tools it needs to be able to formally recognize our governance and that cradle for that ongoing nation-to-nation, government-to-government relationship,” said Froh. The legislation was co-developed by the three Métis governments with Crown-Indigenous Relations. She says the Métis self-government legislation “does what we need it to do and it does no more.” What the delay did do, says Froh, was make her more appreciative of Métis government processes. Miller’s department explained the delay as “out of our control” with rescheduling made necessary because the parliamentary session was nearing its end. However, 80 Métis representatives remained in Ottawa until the bill was introduced. Froh says she is not aware of the reasons behind the delay. The legislation had originally been scheduled to be introduced to the House on Monday June 19. It is with respect to the tax treatment of the Métis governments to be negotiated in the future,” said Crown-Indigenous Relations spokesperson Corolane Gratton.īill C-53 includes the possibility of tax treatment agreements, which are not part of a treaty. “The Ways and Means motion connected with Bill C-53 has no monies associated with it. Ways and Means motions deal with financial measures. Margaret Froh, president of the Métis Nation of Ontario, is “delighted” that legislation that will recognize Métis self-government has received first and second readings upon its introduction in the House of Commons June 21.īill C-53, an Act respecting the recognition of certain Métis governments in Alberta, Ontario and Saskatchewan, to give effect to treaties with those governments and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, was tabled June 16 as a government motion by Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller, with a Ways and Means motion associated with it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |